In response to an invitation extended by the Government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) mounted a ten-member CARICOM Election Observation Mission (CEOM) to observe the General Elections held on 27 November 2025. The Mission is in keeping with the commitment of Heads of Government of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) to support Member States, on their request, by providing an independent, impartial, and honest assessment of the preparations for, and conduct of General Elections.
To adequately provide the independent, impartial, and honest assessment referenced earlier, the CEOM set out to:
1. Observe the entire election process in the host country, including the general atmosphere and environmental conditions under which the elections were being conducted; the activities at the polling stations on the day of the elections; the counting and tabulation of votes after the closing of the polls; and the political climate after the announcement of the results;
2. Collect qualitative and quantitative data regarding the entire election process, including the general administration of the election by the election officials, and the conduct of stakeholders, such as political actors, civil society, the media, and the voting public at large; and
3. Identify opportunities for improvement and make appropriate and timely recommendations.
Pre-Election Period
During the pre-election period, the CEOM engaged several stakeholders to ascertain critical information on the country’s electoral laws and practices. These engagements aided in the further understanding of the political culture and broader environment within which the elections were being held.
In this context, the CEOM met with Dr. the Honourable Ralph Gonsalves, Prime Minister of St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Leader of the Unity Labour Party (ULP) and completed a series of engagements with the Honourable Daniel Cummings, Chairman of the New Democratic Party (NDP), representing Dr. the Honourable Godwin Friday, Leader of the Opposition and of the NDP, Dr. Doris Frederick, Leader of the National Liberation Movement (NLM), and Ms. Kenna Questelles, independent candidate for West St. George.
The CEOM also engaged civic organisations, including representatives of:
- St. Vincent and the Grenadines Teachers’ Union;
- The Voice of the Disabled;
- National Society for the Blind;
- Public Service Union (PSU);
- RedRoot SVG Inc;
- National Monitoring and Consultative Mechanism (NMCM);
- Caribbean Women in Leadership, St. Vincent and the Grenadines (CIWiLSVG);
- Police Welfare Service;
- National Workers Union;
- Commercial, Technical, and Allied Workers’ Union (CTAWU); and
- Media.
The CEOM also met with Ms. Dora James, Supervisor of Elections, and Mr. Enville Williams, Commissioner of Police, as well as a team of senior officers from the Royal St. Vincent and the Grenadines Police Force.
During these engagements, the main issues below were raised.
- Preparations made by the Electoral Office: While most stakeholders expressed confidence about the preparedness of the Electoral Office to conduct the elections, issues such as adequate training for and bias in the appointment of electoral officials were highlighted. Concerns were also raised about accommodation for differently-abled persons.
- The voters’ list and the registration process: The manner in which the voters’ list was compiled, particularly the conduct of the 15-day special registration exercise, was a recurring complaint. Stakeholders also commented on the manner and timeliness of the distribution of said list to the candidates.
- Voter education: Stakeholders commended the voter education resources provided by the Electoral Office; however, at least one stakeholder found it necessary to provide supplementary resources to educate the public.
- Campaign financing and use of state resources: Most stakeholders were curious about the source(s) of funding for the purportedly elaborate campaigns run by the two major political parties and considered whether campaign financing or integrity legislation requiring disclosure would remedy this. Comments were also made about the use of state resources, particularly the timing thereof, to allegedly influence voters.
- External interference in the electoral process: Stakeholders expressed concern about the presence of persons unconnected to St. Vincent and the Grenadines during the election season and their possible interference in the electoral process.
- Security concerns: Stakeholders were fearful of possible post-election violence triggered by rhetoric on the campaign trail and other connected factors.
Election Day Observations
The CEOM team conducted observation in over 85 percent of polling stations across mainland St. Vincent. Observation included the opening of the polls, the voting process throughout the day, the closing of polls, and the counting process.
A summary of the observation follows:
Opening of Polls
Polls generally opened on time at 7 a.m. and there was a sufficient supply of the required voting materials at all polling stations. Nonetheless, in some instances, the opening was delayed by uncertainty and inexperience on the part of some polling staff during the pre-poll activities and lack of preparation of the places of poll prior to Election Day. Observers also noted inconsistencies in the procedures adopted by presiding officers across polling stations.
Voting Process
Throughout the day, observers noted long lines at several polling stations caused by inadequate access to, ingress, egress, and flow of electors in and out of polling stations. This was compounded in some instances by insufficient poll staff and large numbers of electors assigned to certain polling stations.
It was observed that in instances where party agents were active within the 100-yard boundary, no steps were taken to prevent these occurrences. While police ranks were present in the immediate vicinity of the polling station, there was no visible presence outside of the polling places.
Insufficiency of voter education was highlighted by the frequency with which electors encountered issues with the voting process. In a few instances, this resulted in a violation of the secrecy of the ballot.
Closing
At the closing of the polls at 5 p.m., people remaining in line were allowed to vote. There was adherence to the specified closing procedures. Nonetheless, as with the opening of polls, the method utilised varied by polling station and presiding officer. In some instances, there was also uncertainty about the mode of transport of the completed ballot boxes to the returning officers.
Conclusion
While there were some operational and staffing challenges, overall, the General Elections in St. Vincent and the Grenadines were orderly, peaceful, and conducted in an atmosphere of robust civic engagement and camaraderie among the electorate.
The CEOM will prepare a full report for submission to the Secretary-General of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), which will include recommendations for the conduct of future elections in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
The CARICOM Election Observation Mission wishes to express gratitude to the leaders of the political parties, civil society groups, other stakeholders, the media, and the people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines for their warm welcome and cooperation, which contributed to the success of this endeavour.
